Define Your Terms I

Updated: Jun 6

I remember the days when evangelical Christians used to approach me with "do you believe in God?" That was rarely an honest question. It was an attempt to convert me. "Define believe" used to be my response. If they provided a good enough definition, which never happened, I had a bigger task for them-- define God. You can sabotage any conversation by asking people to define their terms. People have a hard time doing it because most words are inherently meaningless, specifically abstract words such as love, friendship, purpose, respect, and kindness. I heckled in order to make them question themselves, hoping they might learn in the process that didn't know what they were talking about. They were holding on to concepts they had themselves created. Life would have been much easier if they had given up these concepts or given up trying to package the human experience into discrete words. The human experience came before the first word was spoken and much before the first word was written. Words only loosely capture some of it. Converting an experience into words is like converting an analog signal into digital. Some information from the original signal is lost forever. If you convert it back to analog, you cannot do so without compromising precision. The same is the problem with redefining that which was summarized into a word when it was first spoken or written. The word was a summary, not the original text, not the original experience. You cannot go back to it. To define an abstract word is just as futile as converting a digital signal back to the original analog signal. When philosophers establish definitions, they create ideas. They make the tail wag the dog. Words are not prior to that which they represent but posterior to it, almost like symbols to fill in the blanks. In general, avoid using abstract words. They mean nothing. But for practical purposes, when you use an abstract word, its meaning is evoked by the context. If I ask you to define good, you're gonna struggle not because you are not philosophically developed, but because good doesn't mean anything by itself. But if I say that it is not good to talk shit behind other people's back, "good" suddenly has meaning. Notice that in this example "not good" also gets contextually defined. If I ask you to define kindness, you're gonna struggle. If I said that it was kind of Roger to talk to he new boy at school, "kindness" suddenly has meaning and so does "not kindness". Tell children a new word. They are clueless. Use the same word a few times. They suddenly know what it means. Thus, we see that the real meaning resides in the context. In fact, in practical usage, the meaning of a word is produced by all words in the sentence but the given word. A word and its context go together. Without the word, the context is incomplete. Without the context, the word is meaningless. When we want to go deeper than their practical usage, the duality dissolves into a unity.

It is all one until you look at it. Then, there are two. Quit looking and they again dissolve into one.

Continued here-

Recent Posts

See All

Physics Possibly A Dead End Game

physics may never find higher truths because physicists don’t look at cause but at effect. Instead of knowing the principle that produces th

On the Limit Of Math & Physics

1/0 is not defined because you can’t get anything out of nothing even if you reproduce it infinitely. This is where hard math fails to deli

Change Is Prior To Time

Time is not causally prior to change. Time stops when change stops, not the other way round. Time is simply a measure or a scale of change.


I can't support this project infinitely. To meet the costs, I need help. If you lack finanial resources, you can contribute non-financially. I need people to help me with marketing, proofreading/editing, creating citations, monetizing and financial integration, and other uncatagorized tasks. Email me if you want to help me out.   

C-95 Urja Nagar Gevra, Korba, Chhattisgarh 495452, India

@2020 by Philosophically Inclined