How To Outargue Women

Updated: Apr 22

This post is meant to be funny. If you can’t take jokes, look somewhere else.

Men argue to prove you wrong. Women argue to make you feel bad about yourself. Their objective is to emotionally break you. This is why they throw a storm of ad hominems when you argue with them. They somehow link everything to why you don’t have a high paying job, why you don’t have a girlfriend, or why your mother doesn’t like you. If they know your insecurity, they will exploit it. They will tie everything to it. My guy friends used to love to see me outargue girls in college. Here’s how I flawlessly did the forbidden.

Unlike most men, I am not driven by sexuality. Thus, I have no reason to agree with women when they say dumb things. I have no insecurity. There is nothing you can say to break me. Not even my mother has that power. If you have insecurities, don’t tell women about them. In fact, just get over them. I tell women my problems, but I am not insecure about them, which makes everything funnier because it looks like I am asking for it.

The secret is accepting their ad hominems. Whenever girls throw personal attacks such as “this is why girls don’t like you” or “this is why you got turned down in that interview”, I simply accept that I am dumber, inferior, ugly, or whatever it is that they are trying to prove. This acceptance suddenly leaves them out of words. Then, I came back with, “even though I am dumb/ugly/any other libel, it really doesn't prove my evidence wrong.” There are many other transitions you can use, such as -

1. Although I agree that I am such and such, how is it related to the data/evidence?

2. You are right about this. My mom says that I am ugly too. Anyway, how would you respond to my evidence?

3. Perhaps, you are right that I am dumb, surely. But that really is not good evidence to prove your point. The premise has to follow the conclusion.

I come up with them on the spot so they flow coherently with my opponent's words. Having calmly accepted the ad hominem, I direct the conversation back to an evidence-based debate. Since they know they lack evidence and have already thrown out personal attacks, they are now out of ammo. At this moment, most women retreat with something like “I have to be somewhere in 10 minutes. We can talk later.” The rest turn on victim mode and start sobbing/crying.

With girls that are too proud, I sometimes start with debasing myself in all ways possible. This is what Eminen does to Clarence in 8 mile. Since I have already accepted all possible labels and invectives, I have already disarmed the opponent. This doesn't even allow women to cry, because I have made no remarks about them. I have only shitted on myself. At this moment, they have no option but to debate on the merit of evidence, which screams defeat.

P.S. If you do this, you may not ever find a wife. Do it at your own risk. I can't be held liable for any ego destruction you may cause. Girls may not even befriend you if you do this.

Recent Posts

See All

People Are Stupid About Marriage

Neither party is supposed to dictate the other but engage in a harmonious spontaneity. It's like a duet. You create harmony by going back ..

Don't Be Pathetic

ome were born blind, deaf, or both. Some were killed before birth. Some were trafficked and sacrificed. Some were orphaned because their fam

Do To Do

Change or transience is the very rule of nature. Great kings made great monuments that no longer exist. No one even knows who those kings we


If you are from India, my UPI is philosophically@ybl. It will pick up my name, Ujjwal Anand.

You can also contribute non-financially. I need people to help me with marketing, monetizing, and other uncategorized tasks. Email me if you want to help me out.